Florida High Court to Hear Arguments in Politicized “Voter Fraud” Case

The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled that a conviction obtained using later-discredited scientific evidence is unconstitutional; relief in these situations depends on state law.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decisions about the president’s power to remove executive officials highlight a neglected constitutional problem related to territorial judges.

States can resist federal overreach by embarking upon their own projects in a way the Constitution has always contemplated.

Justice Todd Eddins has consistently reminded us that state courts need not agree with the U.S. Supreme Court’s reasoning or conclusions — and neither do we.

The court unanimously rejected the federal “open fields doctrine” in favor of the state constitution’s stronger privacy protections.